Case study · 04 of 05

A new digital + physical MRI experience for Medtronic device patients.

Client
Medtronic
Role
Research & Design Lead
Year
2017–2019
Disciplines
Research · Service Design · Strategy

Patients with Medtronic-implanted devices faced friction at every MRI appointment — and the burden of explaining safety, settings, and procedure fell on Medtronic's field clinical team.

Over six weeks, our two-person team — in deep partnership with Medtronic's Customer Experience group — set out to redefine the MRI experience end-to-end, reduce service burden, and unlock broader adoption.

Approach

A small team, a focused window, and a full system to understand.

Engagement

I led research as part of a two-person design team, along with deep partnership from the Medtronic Customer Experience Team. Over a six-week period, we conducted on-site qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, synthesized insights, and co-designed their future MRI experience and workflows to reduce Medtronic service burden and increase adoption.

9
Facilities visited across two U.S. geographies
32
Healthcare professionals interviewed in-situ
6 wks
End-to-end engagement, research through delivery
Outcome

Our team delivered strategic insight into how MRIs for device patients are handled today — pain points, opportunities, best practices, and change management recommendations.

We also delivered two future solutions: workflow changes that could be rolled out immediately, and concepts that included a physical device. These findings were integrated into future Medtronic MRI protocols and rolled out nationwide.

01 / Research

Sitting with the people who actually run the scan.

Method

Through qualitative user research, we sought to gain an in-depth understanding of the MRI process for conditional devices from the perspective of radiologists and MR techs, cardiologists / EPs and their nurses, and Medtronic clinical specialists.

We took an ethnographic approach, interviewing each role individually in their hospital setting. Sessions were 1–2 hours in duration, and included an interview and activities such as card sorting, journey mapping, and co-creating desired solutions to challenges identified in the MR workflow, from the perspective of each role.

What we asked
  1. Walk us through an MRI for a device patient, end to end — who is involved, when, and why.
  2. Where does the workflow break down today, and who absorbs that work?
  3. What does each role need to feel confident handling a conditional device themselves?
  4. If you could redesign the experience tomorrow, what would change first?
Research deliverables
  • Current-state journey map with pain points & opportunities
  • Card-sort ranking of psychological needs by role
  • Cross-role insight set on adoption and service burden
  • Best-practice patterns observed across facilities
02 / Design & Delivery

From insight to a workable plan — short term, long term, and physical.

Approach

After our research and co-design sessions, we translated the findings into insights and strategic recommendations to improve workflow and support adoption of MRI responsibilities for device patients.

These findings were presented to cross-functional stakeholders across Medtronic and were used to drive short- and long-term decisions related to MRI support. Here is a bit of what we learned & delivered.

Workflow recommendations

Immediate changes to roles, hand-offs, and pre-scan steps — designed to be adopted by facility staff without new tooling.

Personas

Five role-based personas covering the MRI workflow — radiologist, MR tech, cardiologist / EP, nurse, and Medtronic clinical specialist.

Change management recommendations

Guidance for Medtronic's Customer Experience team on how to introduce new responsibilities and protocols without breaking trust with facilities.

Physical device concept

A future-state concept pairing workflow change with a purpose-built device — reducing the moments where a Medtronic specialist has to be physically present.

Radiologist persona — Influencer. Radiologists' utmost concern is patient safety; liability concerns arise when there's a lack of communication, so collaboration with Cardiology in early-stage discussions is imperative. Experience: low involvement with scan, low comfort with devices. Mindset, pain points (efficiency pressure, safety with unfamiliar products), and opportunities (forge relationships, device 101 geared to radiology, safety-oriented campaign). Resources ranked from most-valued Time down through Independence/Authority, Support, Confidence, Safeguards, and Immunity from Liability. Click to view full detail
Figure 03 · Persona 1 of 5 The Radiologist — Influencer. Patient safety drives every decision.
Simple Instrument — conceptual drawing of a handheld device with a check-mark display and a small screen reading heart rate 81. Caption notes radiology staff focus on safety; an instrument that increases efficiency and reduces reliance on Medtronic is agreeable. For adoption, it must be simple to use and explicit about what it does and does not do; it should support pre- and post-scan device checks and settings changes with visual confirmations. Click to view full detail
Figure 04 · Concept Simple Instrument — a tool the MR suite would trust, designed for the persona on the left.
03 / Outcome

Findings integrated into Medtronic's MRI protocols, rolled out nationwide.

Impact

Our findings were integrated into Medtronic's MRI protocols and rolled out nationwide — pairing short-term workflow changes the field team could adopt immediately with a longer-term hardware-and-service concept.

The work gave Medtronic's Customer Experience team a clear, role-by-role picture of where service burden was being absorbed today, and a defensible plan for moving more of that work back into the facility.

Next case study
NBC